• Kopirajte / prilepite sporočilo o napaki, ki ga vidite na zaslonu, če ga imate.

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Prosim, pojasnite, kaj ste hoteli storiti, kaj ste naredili in kaj se je zgodilo

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kaj je bilo prikazano na zaslonu, ko ste bili blokirani (prazen zaslon? Del vmesnika za igro? Sporočilo o napaki?)

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kateri del pravil ni bil upoštevan pri priredbi za BGA

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Je kršitev pravil vidna na seznamu potez? Če je, pri kateri številki poteze?

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Katero potezo ste želeli narediti v igri?

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Kaj ste poskušali narediti, da bi izvedli to potezo v igri?

• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskusili to storiti (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Na kateri točki v igri se je težava pojavila (katera navodila so bila prikazana)

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskušali narediti to potezo v igri (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Prosim opiši problem s prikazom. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.

I think it would be clearer if the numbers of the occupied fields would light up in red or something instead of hiding them. That way you always have to count what's already gone.

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?