#133510: "The opponent intentionally did not counted a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed."
Na kaj se nanaša prijava?
Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj
Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj
Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi
Če je tako, GLASUJTE za to poročilo. Poročila z največ glasovi se obravnavajo PREDNOSTNO!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Natančen opis
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite sporočilo o napaki, ki ga vidite na zaslonu, če ga imate.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Prosim, pojasnite, kaj ste hoteli storiti, kaj ste naredili in kaj se je zgodilo
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kaj je bilo prikazano na zaslonu, ko ste bili blokirani (prazen zaslon? Del vmesnika za igro? Sporočilo o napaki?)
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kateri del pravil ni bil upoštevan pri priredbi za BGA
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Je kršitev pravil vidna na seznamu potez? Če je, pri kateri številki poteze?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Katero potezo ste želeli narediti v igri?
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kaj ste poskušali narediti, da bi izvedli to potezo v igri?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
-
• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskusili to storiti (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Na kateri točki v igri se je težava pojavila (katera navodila so bila prikazana)
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskušali narediti to potezo v igri (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Prosim opiši problem s prikazom. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
-
• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?
When the game is over and the opponent counts a dead stone, you can see that the opponent didn't choose his dead stone at all and pressed the finish of selection button. This is a clear cheating attempt to unfairly change the outcome in a game where defeat has been decided. Please check it and take proper action on this.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
-
• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.
Literally, The opponent intentionally did not designate a dead stone in a game where defeat was confirmed, which unfairly changed the outcome of the game.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v127
Zgodovina poročil
Because of my first experience with this, I managed to save my game in this way:
My opponent & I passed. My opponent refused to mark the dead stones. When the question came, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", I naturally answered, "yes". I kept playing and killed enough groups to make the game clearly won, and when we both passed, there was no re-counting of dead stones.
Sure enough, my opponent had selected "no", as I suspected he would.
This clearly promotes cheating. The proposed solutions are as follows, going from best to worst:
1) An algorithm that automatically designates dead stones.
2) NO QUESTION about having another stage for designating stones. Since there was already one stage, but the players COULDN'T AGREE, that means that there AUTOMATICALLY needs to be another round of dead stone designation. This should just happen every time.
3) If the question remains like it does now, it should be that if EITHER or BOTH of the players answers "yes", then there should be a stone counting stage.
Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu
- Drug ID mize/ premikanje ID-ja
- Ali je F5 rešil težavo?
- Se je problem pojavil večkrat? Vsakič? Naključno?
- Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
