#142853: "Conflict Fatigue dominance adjustment is not reset after Dominance Check"
Na kaj se nanaša prijava?
Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj
Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj
Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi
Če je tako, GLASUJTE za to poročilo. Poročila z največ glasovi se obravnavajo PREDNOSTNO!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Natančen opis
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite sporočilo o napaki, ki ga vidite na zaslonu, če ga imate.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Prosim, pojasnite, kaj ste hoteli storiti, kaj ste naredili in kaj se je zgodilo
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Kaj je bilo prikazano na zaslonu, ko ste bili blokirani (prazen zaslon? Del vmesnika za igro? Sporočilo o napaki?)
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Kateri del pravil ni bil upoštevan pri priredbi za BGA
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Je kršitev pravil vidna na seznamu potez? Če je, pri kateri številki poteze?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Katero potezo ste želeli narediti v igri?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Kaj ste poskušali narediti, da bi izvedli to potezo v igri?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
-
• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskusili to storiti (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Na kateri točki v igri se je težava pojavila (katera navodila so bila prikazana)
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskušali narediti to potezo v igri (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Prosim opiši problem s prikazom. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
-
• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Safari v17.6
Zgodovina poročil
Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu
- Drug ID mize/ premikanje ID-ja
- Ali je F5 rešil težavo?
- Se je problem pojavil večkrat? Vsakič? Naključno?
- Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
