Prijava • Board Game Arena

Vse prijave

Prijave igre mapmaker_displayed

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

notabug: To ni hrošč

Na kaj se nanaša prijava?

mapmaker #129404798

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Pravila: pravilo igre ni bilo upoštevano

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Pravila: pravilo igre ni bilo upoštevano

Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi

Če je tako, GLASUJTE za to poročilo. Poročila z največ glasovi se obravnavajo PREDNOSTNO!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Natančen opis

Zgodovina poročil

Dec 7 th 2020 04:01 • TheRandy • Razvijalcem tega hrošča še ni uspelo reproducirati:

The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner.
We both had 4 districts.
We both controlled 1 swing county.
The game assigned the victory to the other payer:
(blue) Forevergm 4 (2)
(red) TheRandy 4 (1)

The output message was: "Number of swing counties won"-
there are only 2 swing counties in the game.

Looking at the rules: "On the rare occasion that there’s still a tie, go to the Supreme Court. Whichever tied player has the fewest total votes for their own party within their own districts wins." My count was: (it might be off a point of 2): 78 blue - 63 red.

Dec 7 th 2020 04:21 • gkz • To ni hrošč:

In an `n` player game, there should be `n + 1` swing counties: the `n` 1 tokens for each color and the neutral 0 token.

In this particular game, the blue player won the red 1 and the blue 1 (looks like the red 1 was underneath a meeple). The red player won the neutral 0. Thus the game counted the swing counties correctly.

---

Note that with 2 players, it should be impossible to go to the Supreme Court (since the tie break is majority of the 3 swing counties). With more players, it's possible to have a tie in swing counties. However, in such a case, the game won't actually fall back to this Supreme Court rule, since that was never implemented :). It'll just say that both players ended up winning. I'm also not sure if BGA's framework will allow for multiple tiebreak conditions (just based on the structure of the config), but I could look into it if it becomes a problem.

Dec 23 rd 2020 18:46 • Scott_wmu • To ni hrošč:

Per the notes above, it looked like the second tiebreaker was never coded (“Supreme Court”). We played a 4 player where is showed a shared victory even though Yellow was the victor per the rules (57 < 65 votes for own in own districts).

boardgamearena.com/table?table=132155273

Just pointing out an occurrence - not sure how often it happens.

Dec 23 rd 2020 19:35 • gkz • To ni hrošč:

Thanks for the note! Could you actually open a suggestion bug about implementing supreme court? I don't think it'll happen that often, but would be better to track separately from this.

Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu

Dodajte vse, kar se zdi primerno, da bi lahko reproducirali ta napako ali razumeli vaš predlog:

Drug ID mize/ premikanje ID-ja
Ali je F5 rešil težavo?
Se je problem pojavil večkrat? Vsakič? Naključno?
Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.

Prekliči Posodobi prijavo

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

Na kaj se nanaša prijava?

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi

Natančen opis

Zgodovina poročil

Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu

Spremeni status prijave v:

Pomoč

Prispevaj

Navigacija

Spremljaj nas