Prijava • Board Game Arena

Vse prijave

Prijave igre justone_displayed

#67657: "Collective Voting"

acknowledged: Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej

Na kaj se nanaša prijava?

justone #282066620

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Predlog: Menim, da bi igranje igre bistveno lahko izboljšali na naslednji način

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Predlog: Menim, da bi igranje igre bistveno lahko izboljšali na naslednji način

Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi

Če je tako, GLASUJTE za to poročilo. Poročila z največ glasovi se obravnavajo PREDNOSTNO!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Natančen opis

Zgodovina poročil

Jul 10 th 2022 00:33 • CaptainTenille • Tega predloga še niso analizirali razvijalci:

not a bug, just a suggestion

Jul 10 th 2022 01:00 • KuWizard • Razvijalci menijo, da to ni dobra ideja ali da je razmerje med stroški in koristmi preveliko:

That's how it was implemented as a first draft. People from publishing company (Repos Production) played with 7 players and decided that it kills the game pace and slows down it a lot. So they asked to do the next player verification only. Pretty sure they won't decide to change back

Jul 10 th 2022 01:24 • CaptainTenille • Razvijalci menijo, da to ni dobra ideja ali da je razmerje med stroški in koristmi preveliko:

so it's better to have duplicate clues got through?

Jul 10 th 2022 06:51 • Pompkin • Razvijalci menijo, da to ni dobra ideja ali da je razmerje med stroški in koristmi preveliko:

for live games it is easily fixed with a countdown timer of something like 10-15 seconds for all the cluegivers when the words are presented. If nobody clicks the duplicate/invalid clue button in that time game just progress as normal. It will both speed up the average waiting time for approving clues and increase the likelihood of catching errors.

Jul 10 th 2022 09:00 • KuWizard • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

Ok, timer could save the situation, I'll try to present this idea if more people vote for this one (it's just 1 vote at the moment)

Jul 10 th 2022 14:14 • CaptainTenille • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

Since it already has been implemented before, can't it just be an option when setting up the game? If the players want it, they just check the box and get the experience that they want.

Jul 11 th 2022 16:09 • Pompkin • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

another problem with letting just 1 player approve of the clues is that they are very likely to improve one of their own clues that break the rules as they wouldnt give that rule breaking clue in the first place if they know the rules.

Jul 11 th 2022 16:10 • Pompkin • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

improve=approve

Jul 28 th 2022 02:16 • FT3 • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

I came here to make the same report, the countdown timer for everyone sounds like a very neat solution to the problem.

Sep 11 th 2022 10:42 • OutOfHabit • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

I would love to see this change implemented, at least as an option .

Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)

Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go

Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now

Oct 26 th 2022 14:27 • Livini • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

#311910257

A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!

Nov 2 nd 2022 09:13 • MIB5799 • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

Possible option: Have only 3 players do approval instead of all 6. Still much much better than only one.

Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).

Dec 14 th 2022 17:45 • bananasplay • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

Make this a table option when creating a game so that players can decide for themselves:
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

Mar 7 th 2024 17:13 • TheInquisitor • Razvijalci se strinjajo, da je to dobra ideja in nameravajo delati na njej:

> Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.

Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu

Dodajte vse, kar se zdi primerno, da bi lahko reproducirali ta napako ali razumeli vaš predlog:

Drug ID mize/ premikanje ID-ja
Ali je F5 rešil težavo?
Se je problem pojavil večkrat? Vsakič? Naključno?
Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.

Prekliči Posodobi prijavo

#67657: "Collective Voting"

Na kaj se nanaša prijava?

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj

Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi

Natančen opis

Zgodovina poročil

Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu

Spremeni status prijave v:

Pomoč

Prispevaj

Navigacija

Spremljaj nas