• Kopirajte / prilepite sporočilo o napaki, ki ga vidite na zaslonu, če ga imate.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Prosim, pojasnite, kaj ste hoteli storiti, kaj ste naredili in kaj se je zgodilo

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imaš posnetek zaslona te napake (priporočljivo), ga lahko naložite na poljuben način (snipboard.io for example) in tukaj prilepite povezavo. Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kaj je bilo prikazano na zaslonu, ko ste bili blokirani (prazen zaslon? Del vmesnika za igro? Sporočilo o napaki?)

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kateri del pravil ni bil upoštevan pri priredbi za BGA

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Je kršitev pravil vidna na seznamu potez? Če je, pri kateri številki poteze?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Katero potezo ste želeli narediti v igri?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kaj ste poskušali narediti, da bi izvedli to potezo v igri?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskusili to storiti (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Na kateri točki v igri se je težava pojavila (katera navodila so bila prikazana)

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskušali narediti to potezo v igri (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?

the described situation occurs between moves 155 and 163 Table #286876848

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Prosim opiši problem s prikazom. Če imaš posnetek zaslona te napake (priporočljivo), ga lahko naložite na poljuben način (snipboard.io for example) in tukaj prilepite povezavo.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imaš posnetek zaslona te napake (priporočljivo), ga lahko naložite na poljuben način (snipboard.io for example) in tukaj prilepite povezavo. Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?

• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.

This is not really about breaking the rules, but about how a bad rule is being abused

I already wrote on the forum that the timeout rule is poorly defined, because it leaves the possibility that a player can avoid defeat in the game despite a lower score.
This is a typical example.
A few moves before the end, player Andrea DF was leading in points, but then Bibine1984 played a piece that completely changed the situation. Suddenly Andrea DF is in third place and Nuno Valente is convincingly last.
At that moment, Nuno Valente stops playing and his time runs out, even though he had over 20 hours to play until that moment.
My guess is that the game will end with Nuno Velente running out of time and Andrea DF will end the game due to player timeout and thus avoid defeat. This does not change anything for Nuno Valente, because he will definitely be the last...
Also, it is possible that Nuno Valente and Andrea DF play cooperatively and that they often abuse such situations, since both of them have a large number of rating points, and it is obvious that they are not playing fair...

• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?