#86908: "Able to go back after playing Assertion card and seeing what Base Conservation Project opponent took"
Na kaj se nanaša prijava?
Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj
Kaj se je zgodilo? Prosimo, izberi spodaj
Prosimo preverite ali že obstaja poročilo o isti zadevi
Če je tako, GLASUJTE za to poročilo. Poročila z največ glasovi se obravnavajo PREDNOSTNO!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Natančen opis
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite sporočilo o napaki, ki ga vidite na zaslonu, če ga imate.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Prosim, pojasnite, kaj ste hoteli storiti, kaj ste naredili in kaj se je zgodilo
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kaj je bilo prikazano na zaslonu, ko ste bili blokirani (prazen zaslon? Del vmesnika za igro? Sporočilo o napaki?)
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kateri del pravil ni bil upoštevan pri priredbi za BGA
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Je kršitev pravil vidna na seznamu potez? Če je, pri kateri številki poteze?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Katero potezo ste želeli narediti v igri?
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Kaj ste poskušali narediti, da bi izvedli to potezo v igri?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
-
• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskusili to storiti (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Na kateri točki v igri se je težava pojavila (katera navodila so bila prikazana)
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Kaj se je zgodilo, ko ste poskušali narediti to potezo v igri (sporočilo o napaki, sporočilo v vrstici stanja, ...)?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Prosim opiši problem s prikazom. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Kopirajte / prilepite besedilo, prikazano v angleščini, namesto v vašem jeziku. Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. -
• Je ta tekst dosegljiv v prevajalnem sistemu? Če ja, ali je bil preveden več kot 24 ur nazaj?
No, it may not have even been in this game that I took back my Assertion Play
• Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
-
• Natančno in jedrnato pojasnite svoj predlog, da bo čim lažje razumeti, kaj mislite.
Doesn't say that it's a rule, formally, but it does feel like you've gained information.
I went back because my opponent kept the Base Conservation Project that I wanted to play, and I played a different animal (without Assertion) instead. • Kateri brskalnik uporabljaš?
Google Chrome v112
Zgodovina poročil
The second player to do so should NOT be able to do a take-back if the Conservation Project card is still in the opponent's hand.
I dunno where a discarded base conservation project goes to.
The discard pile? Back to the base conservation projects pile to be potentially drawn again?
My intuition is that it goes into a separate discard pile for Base Conservation Projects.
I feel this way because that's what I do with final scoring cards in a 4 player game, which becomes relevant when both cards with Resistance get played, and resultantly, during the course of the game we need to draw more Final Scoring cards than exist in the deck.
Note that this could result in the top of the discard deck showing a different back in rare cases, and players just need to do a random selection method (such as shuffling) without looking -- the same as pilfering from a hand that contains a base conservation project.
About your main point, it does seem to me that the second player shouldn't get a take-back because they can deduce the taken conservation project. However, it is a very minor edge case:
* Two DIFFERENT players must both get Assertion animals (there are only two of these in the game).
* The second player must play their Assertion animal before the first player plays their project.
* Even if this very rare case happens, in most cases I suspect it is obvious which project the first player wants, e.g. they have 4 Asia icons and the Asia project is not visible.
I think perhaps this bug is not fixed
Dodaj nekaj k temu poročilu
- Drug ID mize/ premikanje ID-ja
- Ali je F5 rešil težavo?
- Se je problem pojavil večkrat? Vsakič? Naključno?
- Če imate sliko zaslona te napake (dobra praksa), lahko uporabite Imgur.com za nalaganje in kopirate/prilepite povezavo do slike tukaj.
